From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morgan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
532 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-10303 D.C. No. 3:04-cr-00554-SMM-1

06-25-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEFFERSON RAY MORGAN, JR., Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Stephen M. McNamee, Senior District Judge, Presiding


Argued and Submitted June 12, 2013

San Francisco, California

Before: O'SCANNLAIN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and SINGLETON, District Judge.

The Honorable James K. Singleton, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
--------

This Court accepts the government's concession that, in the interests of justice, Morgan's sentence should be vacated, see United States v. Jones, 696 F.3d 932, 937-38 (9th Cir. 2012) (discussing resolving a possible conflict between a sentence orally pronounced and the sentence contained in a subsequent written judgment), and that this case should be remanded for resentencing on an open record, see United States v. Matthews, 278 F.3d 880, 885 (9th Cir. 2002) (en banc). At oral argument Morgan did not object to this suggested resolution of his appeal.

Vacated and Remanded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Morgan

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
532 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JEFFERSON RAY MORGAN…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 25, 2013

Citations

532 F. App'x 666 (9th Cir. 2013)