From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morgan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
4:23-mj-71424 MAG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-mj-71424 MAG

01-09-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MORGAN, Defendant.

JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California SAMANTHA JAFFE Assistant Federal Public Defender. ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California EVAN MATEER Assistant United States Attorney.


JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California SAMANTHA JAFFE Assistant Federal Public Defender.

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California EVAN MATEER Assistant United States Attorney.

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING TO FEBRUARY 20, 2024 AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

HON. DONNA M. RYU Chief United States Magistrate Judge.

The above-captioned matter is set on January 12, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. for a status regarding preliminary hearing and arraignment. The parties jointly request that the Court continue this matter to February 20, 2024 and that the Court exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) until February 20, 2024.

Mr. Morgan is charged with mail theft and theft of mail keys. The government has produced discovery, which includes 22 video files along with reports and photographs. Mr. Morgan is visionimpaired and resides out of District, and so reviewing discovery with him requires additional time, particularly because he cannot see either documents or videos himself.

Counsel for the defense and government counsel are also continuing to negotiate to resolve this case. Additional time will allow for those continued negotiations, as well as continued review of the discovery and discussions about it with Mr. Morgan.

The parties stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The parties agree also that the failure to grant this continuance would deny counsel for Mr. Morgan the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Accordingly, the parties agree that the period of time between January 12, 2024, through February 20, 2024, should be excluded in accordance with the provisions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation of defense counsel, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING

Based on the agreement of the parties in the stipulation above, the status hearing regarding preliminary hearing and arraignment presently set for January 12, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., is vacated. This matter is reset to February 20, 2024, at 10:30 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Morgan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2024
4:23-mj-71424 MAG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MORGAN, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2024

Citations

4:23-mj-71424 MAG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2024)