Opinion
3:16-cr-00032-SLG-KFR
11-13-2023
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RONNIE MORENO, Defendant.
ORDER RE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court at Docket 200 is Mr. Moreno's Motion for Detention Review. The motion was referred to the Honorable Magistrate Judge Kyle F. Reardon. At Docket 204, Judge Reardon issued his Report and Recommendation on Defendant's Motion for Detention Review, in which he recommended that the motion be dismissed without prejudice. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.
The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). That statute provides that a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” A court is to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the magistrate judge's report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” However, § 636(b)(1) does not “require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings.”
Id.
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); see also United States v Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
The magistrate judge recommended that the Court dismiss without prejudice the Motion for Detention Review. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and agrees with its analysis. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation, and IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Detention Review is DISMISSED without prejudice.