From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Morales

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2015
Cr. S 2:12-cr-396 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Federal Defender, HANNAH R. LABAREE, Assistant Federal Defender, Counsel Designated for Service Sacramento, California, Attorneys for Defendant, ARTHUR ALBERT MORALES.

          BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney, JASON HITT Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO REDUCE SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) RETROACTIVE DRUGS-MINUS-TWO REDUCTION CASE

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Defendant, ARTHUR ALBERT MORALES, by and through his attorney, Assistant Federal Defender Hannah R. Labaree, and plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its counsel, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jason Hitt, hereby stipulate as follows:

         1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), this Court may reduce the term of imprisonment in the case of a defendant who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(o);

         2. On July 30, 2013, this Court sentenced Mr. Morales to a total term of 90 months imprisonment;

         3. His total offense level was 31, his criminal history category was III, and the resulting guideline range was 135 to 168 months. He received a reduction off the low-end of the range and the mandatory minimum on the government's motion;

         4. The sentencing range applicable to Mr. Morales was subsequently lowered by the United States Sentencing Commission in Amendment 782, made retroactive on July 18, 2014, see 79 Fed. Reg. 44, 973;

         5. Mr. Morales' total offense level has been reduced from 31 to 29, and his amended guideline range is 108 to 135 months. A reduction comparable to the one he received initially yields a term of 72 months;

         6. Accordingly, the parties request the Court enter the order lodged herewith reducing Mr. Morales' term of imprisonment to a term of 72 months. Respectfully submitted,

          ORDER

         This matter came before the Court on the stipulated motion of the defendant for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

         The parties agree, and the Court finds, that Mr. Morales is entitled to the benefit Amendment 782, which reduces the total offense level from 31 to 29, resulting in an amended guideline range of 108 to 135 months. A reduction comparable to the one he received initially yields a term of 72 months.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the term of imprisonment imposed in July 2013 is reduced to a term of 72 months.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other terms and provisions of the original judgment remain in effect. The clerk shall forthwith prepare an amended judgment reflecting the above reduction in sentence, and shall serve certified copies of the amended judgment on the United States Bureau of Prisons and the United States Probation Office.

         Unless otherwise ordered, Mr. Morales shall report to the United States Probation Office within seventy-two hours after his release.


Summaries of

United States v. Morales

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 19, 2015
Cr. S 2:12-cr-396 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Morales

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR ALBERT MORALES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2015

Citations

Cr. S 2:12-cr-396 JAM (E.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2015)