From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Montanez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00231-MCE

02-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MONTANEZ, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant JOSE MONTANEZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney Matthew M. Scoble for TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar# 87692
Acting Federal Defender
MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
JOSE MONTANEZ

STIPULATION AND ORDER


DATE: March 7, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Morrison C. England Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through TODD LERAS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, defendant, JOSE MONTANEZ, by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for Thursday, February 7, 2013, be continued to Thursday, March 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for March 7, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

JOSE MONTANEZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

Matthew M. Scoble for

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Based on these findings and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. Time is excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced beginning from the date of the stipulation, February 4, 2013, through and including March 7, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare] and Local Code T4. A new status conference date is hereby set for March 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Montanez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Montanez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOSE MONTANEZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00231-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)