From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Miranda

United States District Court, District of Nebraska
Jan 16, 2024
4:24MJ3003 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2024)

Opinion

4:24MJ3003

01-16-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. EDWIN J. CORREA MIRANDA, Defendants.


DETENTION ORDER

Jacqueline M. DeLuca United States Magistrate Judge

The defendant is charged with a drug crime under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the defendant could be required to serve ten or more years in prison. On the government's motion, the court held a detention hearing under the Bail Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). The court concludes the defendant must be detained.

There is a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions of release will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance at court proceedings and the safety of the community because there is probable cause to believe the defendant committed a drug crime under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq.), for which the defendant could be required to serve ten or more years in prison. The defendant has not rebutted this presumption.

Based on the information of record, the court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant's release would pose a risk of nonappearance at court proceedings, and by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's release would pose a risk of harm to the public. Specifically, the court finds the defendant presented no evidence opposing the presumption of detention and indicated at the hearing that he did not contest detention.

Conditions which restrict Defendant's travel, personal contacts, and possession of drugs, alcohol, and/or firearms; require reporting, education, employment, or treatment; or monitor Defendant's movements or conduct; or any combination of these conditions or others currently proposed or available (see 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)), will not sufficiently ameliorate the risks posed if the defendant is released.

Directions Regarding Detention

The defendant is committed to the custody of the Attorney General or a designated representative for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or held in custody pending appeal. The defendant must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to consult privately with defense counsel. On order of the United States Court or on request of an attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility must deliver the defendant to the United States marshal for a court appearance.


Summaries of

United States v. Miranda

United States District Court, District of Nebraska
Jan 16, 2024
4:24MJ3003 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Miranda

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs, v. EDWIN J. CORREA MIRANDA…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nebraska

Date published: Jan 16, 2024

Citations

4:24MJ3003 (D. Neb. Jan. 16, 2024)