From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Milan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 30, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-36 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cv-36

08-30-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN CRAIG MILAN, Defendant.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


DECISION AND ENTRY: (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 22); (2) DENYING AND DISMISSING

DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VACATE (Doc. 21) WITH PREJUDICE; (3) DENYING

ANY REQUESTED CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND (4) CERTIFYING

THAT AN APPEAL WOULD BE OBJECTIVELY FRIVOLOUS

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. (Doc. 22). Defendant did not file any objections to the Report and Recommendations and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, the issues are ripe for decision by the Court.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered the issues presented de novo. Based on that review, the Court: (1) ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 22) in its entirety; (2) DENIES and DISMISSES Defendant's Motion to Vacate (Doc. 21) WITH PREJUDICE; (3) DENIES any requested certificate of appealability; and (4) CERTIFIES that that an appeal would be objectively frivolous.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Milan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 30, 2013
Case No. 3:12-cv-36 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Milan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BRYAN CRAIG MILAN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cv-36 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 30, 2013)