From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mickens

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 21, 2021
18 Cr. 657 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2021)

Opinion

18 Cr. 657 (ALC)

07-21-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DION MICKENS, Defendant.

AUDREY STRAUSS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY ANDREW K. CHAN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY JONATHAN RICHARDSON GLENN A. GARBER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT


AUDREY STRAUSS UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

ANDREW K. CHAN ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY JONATHAN RICHARDSON

GLENN A. GARBER, ESQ. ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT

HONORABLE ANDREW L. CARTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

WHEREAS, on or about September 14, 2018, DION MICKENS (the “Defendant”), and others, were charged in an Indictment, 18 Cr. 657 (ALC) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 28 grams and more of crack cocaine (Count One);

WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Sections 853, of any and all property constituting, or derived from, proceeds the Defendant obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, on or about June 25, 2019, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation with respect to Count One of the Indictment, and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), a sum of money in United States currency, representing the proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment;

WHEREAS, the Defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $2300 in United States currency, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained; and

WHEREAS, the Defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney, Andrew K. Chan of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, Glenn Garber, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $2300 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the Defendant.

2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, DION MICKENS, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

3. All payments on the outstanding money judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable, in this instance, to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New

York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.

4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

5. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the Defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.

6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of for feitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

8. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander J. Wilson, Co-Chief of the Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.

9. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

United States v. Mickens

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 21, 2021
18 Cr. 657 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Mickens

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DION MICKENS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 21, 2021

Citations

18 Cr. 657 (ALC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 21, 2021)