United States v. Michel

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Angel Michel Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2015

CR 09-997-PSG (C.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2015)

Opinion

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Angel Michel Defendant. No. CR 09-997-PSG United States District Court, C.D. California. February 2, 2015

          ORDER OF DETENTION AFTER HEARING [Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)]

          ROBERT N. BLOCK, Magistrate Judge.

         The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the CD CA for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release]; and

         The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a),

         The Court finds that:

         A. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on _______________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________

and/or

         B. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on ____________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending further revocation proceedings.