From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Meza

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 24, 2012
No. 11-10047 (9th Cir. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-10047 D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00047-JCM-PAL

02-24-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAMELA D. MEZA, Defendant - Appellee.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding


Submitted February 21, 2012

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
--------

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

The United States appeals the district court's order reducing the criminal forfeiture money judgment against Pamela D. Meza. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

In light of our holding in United States v. Newman, 659 F.3d 1235 (9th Cir. 2011), we vacate the district court's order reducing Meza's criminal forfeiture money judgment to $298,646.00, and we remand.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. Meza

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Feb 24, 2012
No. 11-10047 (9th Cir. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Meza

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAMELA D. MEZA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

No. 11-10047 (9th Cir. Feb. 24, 2012)