From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Merced

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
Apr 26, 2012
Case No: 2:08-CR-725-01 (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 2:08-CR-725-01 USM No: 29089-050

04-26-2012

United States of America v. HECTOR MERCED

AFPD DAVID HOLMAN Defendant's Attorney


Date of Previous Judgment: 08/05/2010

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable)

AFPD DAVID HOLMAN

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [×] the defendant [] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[×] DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in

the last judgment issued) of ______________________ months IS reduced to ______________________.

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: ___________ Amended Offense Level: ___________

Criminal History Category: ___________ Criminal History Category: ___________

Previous Guideline Range: to months Amended Guideline Range: ___________ to ___________ months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. [] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Defendant is ineligible. A variance placed Defendant at the bottom of the range under the Fair Sentencing Act.

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 08/05/2010 shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: ______________________

(if different from order date)

______________________

Judge's signature

WILLIAM J. MARTINI , U.S.D.J.

Printed name and title


Summaries of

United States v. Merced

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
Apr 26, 2012
Case No: 2:08-CR-725-01 (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Merced

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. HECTOR MERCED

Court:United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

Date published: Apr 26, 2012

Citations

Case No: 2:08-CR-725-01 (D.N.J. Apr. 26, 2012)