Opinion
No. 19-50504
12-12-2019
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. RAUL MENDOZA-CEPEDA, Defendant-Appellant
Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 2:18-CR-1509-1 Before CLEMENT, ELROD, and OLDHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------
Raul Mendoza-Cepeda appeals the 27-month guidelines sentence and three-year term of supervised release imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being found unlawfully in the United States after previous removal. He argues that his sentence is unconstitutional because it exceeds the maximum sentence of 18 U.S.C. § 1326(a) charged in the indictment. However, he correctly concedes that the issue whether his eligibility for a sentencing enhancement under § 1326(b) must be alleged in the indictment and proved to a jury is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998). See United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625-26 (5th Cir. 2007). Thus, summary affirmance is appropriate. Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).
Accordingly, the Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government's alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.