Opinion
CASE NO. 12CR2433-DMS
09-07-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ULISES MENDOZA (1), Defendant.
JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL
IT APPEARING that the defendant is now entitled to be discharged for the reason that: ___________ an indictment has been filed in another case against the defendant and the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal of this case, without prejudice; or ___________ the Court has dismissed the case for unnecessary delay; or X the Court has granted the motion of the Government for dismissal; or ___________ the Court has granted the motion of the defendant for dismissal/judgment of acquittal; or ___________ a jury has been waived, and the Court has found the defendant not guilty; or ___________ the jury has returned its verdict, finding the defendant not guilty; X of the offense(s) as charged in the Indictment:
21 USC 841(a)(1) and 18 USC 2
IT IS THEREFORE ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby discharged.
___________
Hon. DANA M. SABRAW
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE