From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McKinney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2012
CASE NO. 11-12275 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 11-12275

07-18-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACKULINE MCKINNEY, Defendant.


HON. LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF


ORDER

On May 24, 2011, Plaintiff filed its complaint against pro se Defendant Jackuline McKinney. On January 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant did not timely file a response to Plaintiff's Motion. On May 16, 2012, the Court Ordered Defendant to show cause as to why she did not respond to Plaintiff's Motion. The Court's May 16, 2012, Order to Show Cause notified Plaintiff that her failure to respond to the Order could result in the Court's entry of judgment against her by default.

As of the date of this Order, Defendant has failed to respond to either Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment or the Court's Order to Show Cause. Thus, the Court finds that Plaintiff is in direct violation of the Court's Order and appears to not oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

LAWRENCE P. ZATKOFF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned certifies that a copy of this Order was served upon the attorneys of record by electronic or U.S. mail on July 18, 2012.

Marie E. Verlinde

Case Manager


Summaries of

United States v. McKinney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 18, 2012
CASE NO. 11-12275 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McKinney

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JACKULINE MCKINNEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 11-12275 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 18, 2012)