From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McKinley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cr-00117 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12-cr-00117

12-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORDELL JRAKE MCKINLEY

JERRY E. MARTIN United States Attorney for the Middle District of Tennessee Clay T. Lee Assistant United States Attorney


Judge Trauger


MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION

TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

The defendant, Cordell Jrake McKinley, has filed a motion to suppress evidence. (D.E. 31). The United States' requests an additional (3) days time in which to reply to the defendant's motion, which is presently believed due on December 18, 2012. The United States requests this extension of time, from December 18, 2012, to December 21, 2012, in order effectively respond to the issues raised by the defendant. Defense counsel has been conferred and has no objection this extension.

For the foregoing reason, the United States respectfully requests a three (3) day extension of time, to December 21, 2012, in which to respond.

Respectfully submitted,

JERRY E. MARTIN

United States Attorney for the

Middle District of Tennessee

________________________

Clay T. Lee

Assistant United States Attorney


Summaries of

United States v. McKinley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 19, 2012
Case No. 3:12-cr-00117 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McKinley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CORDELL JRAKE MCKINLEY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:12-cr-00117 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 19, 2012)