From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McKenna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 3, 2013
2:12-cr-00082-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cr-00082-APG-VCF

07-03-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE MCKENNA, Defendant.


ORDER


[Defendant George McKenna's Motion for

Release to Attend the Funeral of his minor child

or, in the Alternative, for the US Marshals Office

of Transport George McKenna to the Funeral

(#372)]

Before the Court is Defendant George McKenna's Motion for Release to Attend the Funeral of his minor child or, in the Alternative, for the US Marshals Office of Transport George McKenna to the Funeral (#372).

Relevant Background:

Defendant made his initial appearance/arraignment and plea on April 24, 2012. (#49). Defendant pleaded not guilty to counts 1 through 3. Id. On September 13, 2012, Defendant pleaded guilty to counts 1 and 3 of the Superseding indictment and the Court accepted his guilty plea. (#190). Defendant was remanded to custody. Id. A sentencing and disposition hearing was held on March 25, 2013 (#330) and judgment was entered on March 27, 2013 (#333). He was sentenced to 46 months incarceration for his Conspiracy conviction, to run consecutively to the 24-month term for his Aggravated Identity Theft conviction, for a total prison term of 70 months. Id. He is currently in the Pahrump jail facility awaiting his facility designation from the Bureau of Prisons.

Defendant's Position:

On June 26, 2013, Defendant filed a Motion for Release to Attend the Funeral of His Minor Child or, in the Alternative, for the US Marshals Office to Transport George McKenna to the Funeral (#372). Defendant's son passed away as a result of an automobile collision. Defendant is requesting release for the purpose of attending his son's funeral in California. Id. If the Court is unwilling to release him to attend services, Defendant requests the United States Marshals to transport him to attend funeral services. Id.

Government's Response Opposition Defendant's Motion for Release or Marshal Transport to Funeral:

The Government filed a Response Opposing Defendant's Motion for Release or Marshal Transport to Funeral (Doc. No. 372) on June 28, 2013. (#375). Defendant has an extensive criminal history. "His criminal history shows numerous failures to appear, failures to comply with Courts' orders, and numerous instances where supervision was revoked in favor of jail time." Id. On July 13, 2012, Defendant failed to self-surrender to serve his twenty-four (24) month California state prison sentence. Id. The Government states that, [w]hile on the run in "escape" status, [D]efendant McKenna left California and traveled to Nevada, where he personally committed criminal acts in furtherance of this federal conspiracy case in August 2011." Id. Also, Defendant has a history of controlled substance abuse and has stated to the United States Probation Office that he cannot think clearly when under the influence of controlled substances. In the past, deaths in his family have negatively weakened his ability to resist using controlled substances. The recent death of his son may do the same and weaken his ability to resist using controlled substances. Id.

The Government objects to ordering the United States Marshals Service to transport Defendant to the funeral. Defendant has known California gang ties and there are safety concerns to the Defendant and the transporting deputy. The Government asserts that, "a co-defendant was recently assaulted in connection with her membership in the criminal organization." Id. The safety of the Defendant and the Marshal may be compromised by taking the Defendant to California for the funeral. Id.

On July 3, 2013, Defendant filed a Reply in support of his instant motion. (#376). The funeral is scheduled for July 6, 2013. Defendant argues that, "[t]here is nothing to suggest that allowing the U.S. Marshals Service to transport Defendant George McKenna would place them in any danger" as Defendant is does not pose a danger to anyone and he is no longer gang involved. Id.

Discussion:

The Court recognize that Defendant has suffered a great loss with the death of his son. In considering his past criminal history, however, Defendant has failed to comply with Court orders numerous times. He has failed to self-surrender and has committed criminal acts while on the run. Given his prior failure to self-surrender, the Court must consider that there is an increased likelihood that Defendant may escape while temporary released to attend the funeral. Defendant has known California gang ties and there are safety concerns to the Defendant and the transporting deputy. The Government asserts in their Opposition that, "a co-defendant was recently assaulted in connection with her membership in the criminal organization." Id. This demonstrates a serious risk of danger for the Defendant and the transporting Marshal.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant George McKenna's Motion for Release to Attend the Funeral of his minor child or, in the Alternative, for the US Marshals Office of Transport George McKenna to the Funeral (#372) is DENIED.

_________________

CAM FERENBACH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. McKenna

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 3, 2013
2:12-cr-00082-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. McKenna

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE MCKENNA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 3, 2013

Citations

2:12-cr-00082-APG-VCF (D. Nev. Jul. 3, 2013)