From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McIntosh

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2019
No. 19-10131 (11th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 19-10131

10-15-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00018-TWT-JKL-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and GRANT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

William A. Morrison, appointed counsel for Patrick McIntosh in this appeal from an order of civil commitment, entered pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4243, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the order committing McIntosh to the custody of the Attorney General is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. McIntosh

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Oct 15, 2019
No. 19-10131 (11th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. McIntosh

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PATRICK RANDELL MCINTOSH…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 15, 2019

Citations

No. 19-10131 (11th Cir. Oct. 15, 2019)