From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McGown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2024
4:20-CR-00098-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

4:20-CR-00098-02-JM

06-28-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEDRIC LAMONT MCGOWN


ORDER

Defendant's Motion to Reduce Sentence (Doc. No. 492) is DENIED.

Applying retroactive guideline Amendment 821 does not reduce Defendant's criminal history category or guideline range because he was sentenced as a career offender. Even if he was not a career offender, his criminal history category would remain the same.

See United States Sentencing Guidelines § 1B1.10 (a)(2) (“Exclusions.-A reduction in the defendant's term of imprisonment is not consistent with this policy statement and therefore is not authorized under 18 u.s.C. § 3582(c)(2) if- . . . an amendment listed in subsection (d) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant's applicable guideline range.”).

Amendment 821 reduces his criminal history score from 12 to 11.

Additionally, Defendant's plea agreement “waive[d] the right to have the sentence modified pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) ....” Because Defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into his plea agreement, including this waiver, he is not entitled to relief.

Doc. No. 295.

United States v. Cowan, 781 Fed.Appx. 571 (8th Cir. 2019) (affirming dismissal of a § 3582(c)(2) motion when the record establish that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered the plea agreement).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. McGown

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 28, 2024
4:20-CR-00098-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. McGown

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SEDRIC LAMONT MCGOWN

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

4:20-CR-00098-02-JM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 28, 2024)