From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McGowan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CR-207 LKK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-207 LKK

02-27-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MCGOWAN, ET AL., Defendants.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney WILLIAM S. WONG MICHAEL D. ANDERSON Assistant United States Attorneys DONALD KILMER Counsel for Defendant


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
WILLIAM S. WONG
MICHAEL D. ANDERSON
Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

DISCOVERY HEARING AS TO DEFENDANT

EARLY AND EXCLUDING TIME


STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

This matter came before the Court for a status conference on January 8, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. At the parties' request, the Court set briefing and motions schedule for discovery, including a status conference and hearing on March 12, 2013. Defendant Early filed a motion for discovery pursuant to that schedule. No other defendants filed discovery motions. The Court referred defendant Early's matter to the duty magistrate for hearing.

The government and Donald Kilmer, counsel for Mr. Early, are continuing to resolve informally as many discovery issues as possible prior to hearing on the discovery motion. Counsel and the government need additional time to meet and confer regarding discovery and to allow defense inspection of government exhibits. Therefore, the parties request that the discovery motion hearing be reset to April 9, 2013; that the government's opposition be due on March 26, 2013; and that the defendant's reply be due on April 2, 2013.

The parties further agree that the court's previous order setting a status conference for March 12, 2013, and excluding time up to that date should remain in effect.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

______________

WILLIAM S. WONG

MICHAEL D. ANDERSON

Assistant United States Attorneys

______________

DONALD KILMER

Counsel for Defendant

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED this 27th day of February, 2013

______________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. McGowan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 27, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-CR-207 LKK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. McGowan

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RYAN MCGOWAN, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 27, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CR-207 LKK (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2013)