From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McFarlane

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 15, 2019
No. 18-13235 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-13235

02-15-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COYWAE MCFARLANE, a.k.a. Raymond Etabert Codrington, a.k.a. Kyle McFarland, Defendant-Appellant.


[DO NOT PUBLISH] Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:14-cr-00487-JDW-AEP-1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida Before MARCUS, MARTIN and BRANCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Federal Defender's Office, appointed counsel for Coywae McFarlane in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). McFarlane responded and filed a motion to supplement the record. Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel's assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, McFarlane's convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED, and McFarlane's motion to supplement the record is DENIED.


Summaries of

United States v. McFarlane

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Feb 15, 2019
No. 18-13235 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. McFarlane

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. COYWAE MCFARLANE, a.k.a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Feb 15, 2019

Citations

No. 18-13235 (11th Cir. Feb. 15, 2019)

Citing Cases

McFarlane v. United States

McFarlane, No. 8:15-cv-1320-T-27AEP, ECF: 34, 37, 39, 40. And his amended judgment and sentence were…