From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McDonald

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2013
516 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 12-10412 D.C. No. 1:07-cr-00049-AWI

04-22-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH HENRY McDONALD, Jr., Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth Henry McDonald, Jr. appeals from the district court's revocation of supervised release and the nine-month sentence imposed upon revocation. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.

McDonald contends, and the government agrees, that the district court improperly delegated judicial authority by construing Standard Condition 3 to permit the probation officer to prohibit McDonald from possessing certain types of cell phones and images of minors. A district court may only "delegate to the probation officer the details of where and when the condition will be satisfied." United States v. Stephens, 424 F.3d 876, 880 (9th Cir. 2005). Here, construing Standard Condition 3 to allow the probation officer to impose new substantive conditions was an improper delegation regarding the "primary decision" of what supervised release conditions should be imposed. See id. at 882. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand for resentencing solely on the basis of McDonald's violation of Special Condition 8.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

United States v. McDonald

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2013
516 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

United States v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. KENNETH HENRY McDONALD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2013

Citations

516 F. App'x 645 (9th Cir. 2013)