From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McDonald

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 10, 2023
12 CR 00099 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2023)

Opinion

12 CR 00099

02-10-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CORY McDONALD, Defendant.


DETENTION ORDER

(VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE)

The defendant having been arrested for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of supervised release; and

Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.l(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), the Court orders the above-named defendant detained and finds that:

[X] The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to flee; and/or

[X] The defendant has not met defendant's burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that defendant is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c).

This finding is based on the reasons stated on the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. McDonald

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Feb 10, 2023
12 CR 00099 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. McDonald

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CORY McDONALD, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Feb 10, 2023

Citations

12 CR 00099 (E.D. Cal. Feb. 10, 2023)