From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McClure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Apr 30, 2012
Case No: DNCW308CR000139-001 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: DNCW308CR000139-001 USM No: 23133-058

04-30-2012

United States of America v. TENAKA McCLURE True Name: TANAKA DERODD McCLURE

Ross Richardson Defendant's Attorney


Date of Original Judgment: March 30, 2010

Date of Last Amended Judgment: April 4, 2010

Ross Richardson

Defendant's Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of [×] the defendant [ ] the Director of the Bureau of Prisons [ ] the court under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

[ ] DENIED. [×] GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in the last judgment issued) of 120 months is reduced to 100 months I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Original Offense ¦27 ¦Amended Offense ¦25 ¦ ¦Level: ¦ ¦Level: ¦ ¦ +--------------------+-----------------+--------------------+-----------------¦ ¦ ¦V ¦ ¦V ¦ ¦Criminal History ¦ ¦Criminal History ¦ ¦ ¦Category: ¦Counts 1-3: 120 ¦Category: ¦Counts 1-3: 100 ¦ ¦ ¦to 150 ¦ ¦to 125 ¦ +--------------------+-----------------+--------------------+-----------------¦ ¦Original Guideline ¦months ¦Amended Guideline ¦months ¦ ¦Range: ¦ ¦Range: ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

[×] The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range. [ ] The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time of sentencing and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the amended guideline range. [ ] The reduced sentence is above the amended guideline range. [×] Other (explain): The reduced sentence of 100 months in each of Counts One through Three (concurrent) represents the low end of the revised guideline range.

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Upon release from imprisonment, and absent a residential plan accepted by the U.S. Probation Officer prior to release from incarceration, it is ordered that as a condition of supervised release the defendant shall submit to the local Residential Reentry Center for a period not to exceed 90 days, with work release, at the direction of the U.S. Probation Officer. Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated March 30, 2010, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Effective Date: _____________

(if different from order date)

_____________

Frank D. Whitney

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. McClure

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina
Apr 30, 2012
Case No: DNCW308CR000139-001 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McClure

Case Details

Full title:United States of America v. TENAKA McCLURE True Name: TANAKA DERODD McCLURE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the Western District of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 30, 2012

Citations

Case No: DNCW308CR000139-001 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 30, 2012)