From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McCauley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2014
Case No. 3:06-cr-154 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cr-154

01-31-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. MCCAULEY, Defendant.


Judge Timothy S. Black

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 126) AND DISMISSING DEFENDANT'S MOTION

(Doc. 125) WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz. (Doc. 126). The Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant's Motion to Correct its Lack of Sentencing Authority and to Correct its Judgment and Commitment Order (Doc. 125) be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant did not file any objection to the Report and Recommendations and the time for doing so has expired.

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered the issues presented de novo. Based on that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendations (Doc. 126) in its entirety and DISMISSES Defendant's Motion (Doc. 125) WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. McCauley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 31, 2014
Case No. 3:06-cr-154 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. McCauley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS L. MCCAULEY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cr-154 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 31, 2014)