From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. McAllister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
No. 3:10-cr-00138 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:10-cr-00138

09-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARIN LEE MCALLISTER, Defendant.


Judge Nixon


ORDER

Pending before the Court is an order of remand for further findings of fact entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (Doc. No. 129), following an appeal by Defendant Darin Lee McAllister. United States v. McAllister, -- F.3d --- (6th Cir. 2012).

In his appeal, Defendant claimed (1) the Court erred in denying his Bat son challenge to the prosecution's use of peremptory strikes against African-American jurors; (2) judicial misconduct; (3) prosecutorial misconduct; and (4) ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. (Id.)

While the Court of Appeals rejected Defendant's claims of misconduct and ineffective assistance of counsel, it remanded for further findings of fact on the Batson challenge. (Id. at 8-18.) Specifically, the appellate court held that this Court's ruling on Defendant's Batson challenge did not meet the requirements of explicit, on-the-record analysis of each element of such a challenge. (Id. at 8-11.) As a result, it remanded for the Court "to make explicit on-the-record findings as to whether McAllister established the existence of purposeful race discrimination in the selection of his jury, and whether his Batson challenge requires that his conviction be reversed." (Id. at 12.) The Court of Appeals noted that, "[i]n making those findings, the [district] court must consider all evidence, including juror questionnaires, that bear on the issue of racial animosity." (Id. at 12-13.)

The Court hereby SETS a status conference by telephone conference call for Thursday, October 4, 2012, at 1:00 p.m., to be initiated by the Court. The Court requests that the parties prepare to discuss how to proceed with this unusual remand and what evidence will be used for the findings of fact.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. McAllister

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Sep 20, 2012
No. 3:10-cr-00138 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. McAllister

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DARIN LEE MCALLISTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2012

Citations

No. 3:10-cr-00138 (M.D. Tenn. Sep. 20, 2012)