From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Maxwell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
20-CR-330 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

20-CR-330 (AJN)

12-16-2021

United States of America, v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.


ORDER

ALISON J. NATHAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Court is in receipt of the parties' joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes “that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance.” The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record.

Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m.

The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Maxwell

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
20-CR-330 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Maxwell

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

20-CR-330 (AJN) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)