From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mauck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jan 20, 2017
CR 16-68-BLG-SPW-TJC-3 (D. Mont. Jan. 20, 2017)

Opinion

CR 16-68-BLG-SPW-TJC-3

01-20-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBI MAUCK, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Defendant, by consent, appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and entered a plea of guilty to Count I of the superseding information (Doc. 87), which charges the crime of conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and Count II of the superseding information, which charges the crime of conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).

After examining the Defendant under oath, the Court determined:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea to the criminal offenses charged against her;

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charges against her and the consequences of pleading guilty to the charges;

3. That the Defendant fully understands her pertinent constitutional rights and the extent to which she is waiving those rights by pleading guilty to the criminal offenses charged against her; and

4. That her plea of guilty to the criminal offenses charged against her is knowingly and voluntarily entered, and is supported by independent factual grounds sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offenses charged.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement (Doc. 88) with counsel, that Defendant fully understands each and every provision of the agreement and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true.

Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of Counts I and II in the superseding information and that sentence be imposed.

Objections to these Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Findings and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Crim. P 59(b)(2).

DATED this 20th day of January, 2017.

/s/_________

TIMOTHY J. CAVAN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Mauck

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Jan 20, 2017
CR 16-68-BLG-SPW-TJC-3 (D. Mont. Jan. 20, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Mauck

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BOBBI MAUCK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Jan 20, 2017

Citations

CR 16-68-BLG-SPW-TJC-3 (D. Mont. Jan. 20, 2017)