From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mattox

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
No. 21CR0098-JLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)

Opinion

21CR0098-JLS

08-24-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ENGLYSH MICHELLE MATTOX, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION TO APPEAR BY VIDEO/TELEPHONE AT SENTENCING AND CONTINUING SENTENCING HEARING

Janis L. Sammartino United States District Judge.

The Court has considered Defendant's Motion to Appear by Video/Telephone at Sentencing; or in the Alternative, Motion to Waive Personal Presence for Sentencing Hearing (ECF No. 50) and the Government's response thereto. Rule 43(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure requires that a Defendant be present at sentencing. Section 15002(b)(1) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act permits the use of video or telephone conferencing for certain proceedings, but felony sentencing proceedings are not among them. Therefore, the Court concludes that Defendant must be physically present at her sentencing hearing. Accordingly, Defendant's motion is Denied.

Given the short period of time remaining to make travel arrangements and Defendant's health concerns, the Court will continue the sentencing hearing from August 30, 2021 to Monday, September 27, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. Defendant shall file an acknowledgment of the new hearing date by September 10, 2021.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mattox

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Aug 24, 2021
No. 21CR0098-JLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Mattox

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ENGLYSH MICHELLE MATTOX, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Aug 24, 2021

Citations

No. 21CR0098-JLS (S.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2021)