From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Massa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 26, 2020
00-cr-1118 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 26, 2020)

Opinion

00-cr-1118 (JSR)

06-26-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. AMERICO MASSA, Defendant.


ORDER

On December 2, 2002, Americo Massa pled guilty to three Counts of a superseding information: (1) racketeering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) ("Count 1"); (2) conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C § 1959(a)(5) ("Count 2"); and (3) use of a firearm in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c), for which the predicate offense was conspiracy to commit murder in aid of racketeering ("Count 3"). On March 25, 2003, the Court sentenced Massa to 35 years' imprisonment.

On April 15, 2020, the Court granted, on the Government's consent, Massa's motion to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction on Count 3 in light of United States v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 2319 (2019). ECF No. 809. The Court amended the judgment to vacate the conviction on Count 3 and accordingly reduced the defendant's sentence by 60 months' imprisonment to 30 years. On June 10, Massa appealed this amended judgment. ECF No. 814.

Massa now moves for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). ECF No. 813. In light of Massa's pending appeal of the April 15 amended judgment, however, the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this motion. A notice of appeal "divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal," Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982), in both civil and criminal cases, United States v. Ransom, 866 F.2d 574, 575 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Although this rule does not prevent a district court from correcting clerical errors or acting to aid an appeal, it forbids the district court from making "substantive modifications of judgments," even to the benefit of a defendant. Ransom, 866 F.2d at 575-76.

Accordingly, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 37(a)(2), Massa's motion for compassionate release is denied.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, NY

June 26, 2020

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Massa

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jun 26, 2020
00-cr-1118 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 26, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Massa

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. AMERICO MASSA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jun 26, 2020

Citations

00-cr-1118 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 26, 2020)