From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2012
Case No. 11-20551-4 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 11-20551-4

07-09-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERNON LEE MASON IV, et al., Defendants.


ORDER STRIKING "MOTION FOR REVOCATION OF DETENTION ORDER"

On June 26, 2012, the Clerk of the Court docketed a "Motion for Revocation of Detention Order." The court will strike the pro se motion because, at the time of the filing, Defendant Vernon Mason IV was represented by counsel. Thus, all filings must be made by the attorney of record.

Defendant is not entitled to represent himself while simultaneously being represented by counsel. A criminal defendant has the right to appear pro se or by counsel, a right protected by both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and federal statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654 ("In all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel . . . ."); see also Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 807, 832 (1975); United States v. Daniels, 572 F.2d 535, 540 (5th Cir. 1978); Ennis v. LeFevre, 560 F.2d 1072, 1075 (2d Cir. 1977); United States v. Williams, 534 F.2d 119, 123 (8th Cir. 1976). This right, however, is disjunctive, thus a party may chose either to represent himself or to appear through an attorney. There is no right to "hybrid" representation that would result in simultaneous or alternating self-representation and representation by counsel. A person represented by counsel must rely upon that counsel. See, e.g., United States v. Olson, 576 F.2d 1267, 1269-70 (8th Cir. 1978); Daniels, 572 F.2d at 540; Ennis, 560 F.2d at 1075; Williams, 534 F.2d at 123; United States v. Hill, 526 F.2d 1019, 1024-25 (10th Cir. 1975); Move Org. v. City of Phila., 89 F.R.D. 521, 523 n.1 (E.D. Pa.1981); United States ex rel. Snyder v. Mack, 372 F.Supp. 1077, 1078-79 (E.D. Pa.1974); cf. Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1352-53 (9th Cir. 1981) (once counsel is appointed, prisoner has no right to assistance from inmate writ-writer). In light of this case law, the court will only accept motions filed by Defendant's attorney of record. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's "Motion for Revocation of Detention Order" [Dkt. # 148] is hereby STRICKEN from the docket of this court.

__________________

ROBERT H. CLELAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record on this date, July 9, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Lisa Wagner

Case Manager and Deputy Clerk

(313) 234-5522
S:\Cleland\JUDGE'S DESK\C1 ORDERS\11-20551.MASON.Strike.Pro.Se.Mot.Represented.jrc.wpd


Summaries of

United States v. Mason

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2012
Case No. 11-20551-4 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Mason

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. VERNON LEE MASON IV, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

Case No. 11-20551-4 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 9, 2012)