From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Martinez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 13, 2006
212 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted December 4, 2006 .

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Mary Beth Pfister, Esq., USPX--Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David M. Ochoa, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Mary H. Murguia, Distict Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-03-00606-MHM.

Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Juan Dedios Martinez appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 8-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Martinez has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's order.


Summaries of

United States v. Martinez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 13, 2006
212 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Martinez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Juan Dedios MARTINEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 13, 2006

Citations

212 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

United States v. Frazier

That case, however, was decided under Ninth Circuit, not Sixth Circuit, law. Even so, the Ninth Circuit…