From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Markevich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:11-CR-00490 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-CR-00490 JAM

01-31-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IRINA MARKEVICH, et al. Defendants.

MICHAEL E. HANSEN Attorney for Defendant SERGEY PUKHKAN Michael E. Hansen for TIMOTHY WARRINER Attorney for Defendant IRINA MARKEVICH Michael E. Hansen for ALEX MARKEVICH Defendant Pro Se Michael E. Hansen for CLIFFORD SCHERER Attorney for Defendant ANATOLIY MARKEVICH Michael E. Hansen for MARK REICHEL Attorney for Defendant DANIIL MARKEVICH Michael E. Hansen for JULIA YOUNG Attorney for Defendant SVETLANA MARKEVICH Michael E. Hansen for DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant MARINA PUKHKAN BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney By: Michael E. Hansen for STEVEN LAPHAM Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


Michael E. Hansen
Attorney at Law, SBN 191737
711 Ninth Street, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95814
916.438.7711 FAX 916.864.1359
Attorney for Defendant
SERGEY PUKHKAN

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING

STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO

EXCLUDE TIME PURSUANT TO THE

SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

On January 29, 2013, the parties appeared before the Court for a status conference. Assistant United States Attorney Steven Lapham appeared on behalf of plaintiff United States of America. Counsel for all defendants appeared on behalf of their respective clients. Alex Markevich appeared pro se.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the next status conference has been set for April 9, 2013, at 9:45 a.m.

The Government concurs with this request.

Further, the parties agree and stipulate the ends of justice served by the granting of such a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial and that time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act should therefore be excluded under 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), corresponding to Local Code T-4 (to allow defense counsel time to prepare), from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 31, 2013, to and including April 9, 2013.

Accordingly, the parties respectfully request the Court adopt this proposed stipulation.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Respectfully submitted,

______________________

MICHAEL E. HANSEN

Attorney for Defendant

SERGEY PUKHKAN

Michael E. Hansen for

TIMOTHY WARRINER

Attorney for Defendant

IRINA MARKEVICH

Michael E. Hansen for

ALEX MARKEVICH

Defendant Pro Se

Michael E. Hansen for

CLIFFORD SCHERER

Attorney for Defendant

ANATOLIY MARKEVICH

Michael E. Hansen for

MARK REICHEL

Attorney for Defendant

DANIIL MARKEVICH

Michael E. Hansen for

JULIA YOUNG

Attorney for Defendant

SVETLANA MARKEVICH

Michael E. Hansen for

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

MARINA PUKHKAN

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By:Michael E. Hansen for

STEVEN LAPHAM

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order.

Based on the stipulation of the parties and the recitation of facts contained therein, the Court finds that it is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings and trial itself within the time limits established in 18 U.S.C. section 3161. In addition, the Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel to this stipulation reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 31, 2013, to and including April 9, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and Local Code T4 (reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the next status conference shall be held on April 9, 2013, at 9:45 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________

JOHN A. MENDEZ

United States District Court Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Markevich

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 31, 2013
No. 2:11-CR-00490 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Markevich

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. IRINA MARKEVICH, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-CR-00490 JAM (E.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2013)