From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 8, 2013
2:11-CR-453-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)

Opinion

2:11-CR-453-PMP-CWH

04-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID M. MARK, Defendant.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Brian Pugh, Sarah Griswold COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Michael Fawer, Miles Mark


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE PHILIP M. PRO , UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: Donna Sherwood RECORDER: Henry Enriquez COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF: Brian Pugh, Sarah Griswold COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT: Michael Fawer, Miles Mark PROCEEDINGS: HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S RULE 29 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL [130] 9:00 a.m. Court convenes. Defendant is present on a PR Bond. The Court advises counsel the clerk received a call last week from Juror #9, who is requesting to be excused due to a financial hardship. The Court will discuss this matter further with counsel. The Court hears the arguments of Mr. Fawer and Ms. Griswold. IT IS ORDERED Defendant's Rule 29 Motion for Judgment of Acquittal [130, 132] is Denied. IT IS ORDERED the Government's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Proposed Expert Butler, or in the alternative, Limit James Butler's Testimony [80] is granted without prejudice to the defendant to again offer Butler in the event the defendant testifies or other evidence is presented on behalf of the defendant. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Defendant's Motion in Limine to Exclude Use at Trial of a Withdrawn Plea Agreement or in the alternative to Limit its Use [68] is denied without prejudice to defendant to renew it at such time as the Government attempts to use the plea agreement for impeachment purposes. 9:50 a.m. Court stands at recess. 10:10 a.m. Court reconvenes. Mr. Fawer announces the defense rests. Juror #9 is contacted by telephone and the Court and counsel confer with him regarding his request to be excused due to a financial hardship. After discussion with Juror #9, it is determined he will remain on the jury for the duration of the trial. The Court hears and rules on the objections of counsel to the proposed jury instructions. 12:00 p.m. Court stands at recess. 1:30 p.m. Court reconvenes. The Court does not find it appropriate to give Defendant's Proposed Jury Instruction No. 8 Theory of Defense [135] to the jury. The Court and counsel confer on miscellaneous issues. 1:50 p.m. Court adjourns.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

United States District Court

By: _________________

Donna Sherwood, Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

United States v. Mark

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Apr 8, 2013
2:11-CR-453-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Mark

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAVID M. MARK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 8, 2013

Citations

2:11-CR-453-PMP-CWH (D. Nev. Apr. 8, 2013)