From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Marizcal-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
Case Number: 09CR2080-DMS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Case Number: 09CR2080-DMS

10-19-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTURO FRANCISCO MARIZCAL-LOPEZ

Brian J White CJA Defendant's Attorney


JUDGMENT IN A CRIMINAL CASE

(For Revocation of Probation or Supervised Release)

(For Offenses Committed On or After November 1, 1987)

Brian J White CJA

Defendant's Attorney

REGISTRATION No. 96144198 [ ]

THE DEFENDANT:

[×] admitted guilt to violation of allegation(s) No. 1 and 2

[ ] was found in violation of allegation(s) No. __________________ after denial of guilt.

ACCORDINGLY, the court has adjudicated that the defendant is guilty of the following allegation(s):

+-------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Allocation Number ¦Nature of Violation ¦ +-------------------+-----------------------------------¦ ¦1,2 ¦Failure to report as directed (nv7)¦ +-------------------------------------------------------+

Supervised Release is revoked and the defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 2 of this judgment. This sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant shall notify the United States Attorney for this district within 30 days of any change of name, residence, or mailing address until all fines, restitution, costs, and special assessments imposed by this judgment are fully paid. If ordered to pay restitution, the defendant shall notify the court and United States Attorney of any material change in the defendant's economic circumstances.

OCTOBER 19, 2012

Date of Imposition of Sentence

__________________

HON. DANA M. SABRAW

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a term of THREE (3) MONTHS. [ ] The court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons: [ ] The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal. [ ] The defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

[ ] at __________________ [ ] a.m. [ ] p.m. on __________________
as notified by the United States Marshal.

[ ] The defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:

[ ] before __________________
[ ] as notified by the United States Marshal.
[ ] as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

RETURN

I have executed this judgment as follows:

Defendant delivered on __________________ to __________________ at __________________, with a certified copy of this judgment.

__________________

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By __________________

DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL


Summaries of

United States v. Marizcal-Lopez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 19, 2012
Case Number: 09CR2080-DMS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Marizcal-Lopez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ARTURO FRANCISCO MARIZCAL-LOPEZ

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 19, 2012

Citations

Case Number: 09CR2080-DMS (S.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2012)