From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mann

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Apr 30, 2024
CRIMINAL 2:23-cr-00367-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2024)

Opinion

CRIMINAL 2:23-cr-00367-BHH

04-30-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCK CYRIL MANN


PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO MARK CYRIL MANN

BRUCE HOWE HENDRICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the court on the motion of the United States for a Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Defendant Mark Cyril Mann (“Mann”, “Defendant”), based upon the following:

1. On May 9, 2023, an Indictment was filed charging Mann with attempt to transfer obscene material to a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1470, and committing a felony offense involving a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2260A.

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a), the Indictment contained a forfeiture allegation providing that upon Mann's conviction, certain properties enumerated therein, or equivalent substitute assets, would be subject to forfeiture to the United States. As specified therein, such assets include, but are not limited to the following:

A. Proceeds/Forfeiture Judgment:

The government is not pursuing a forfeiture judgment against the Defendant.

A sum of money equal to all proceeds the Defendant obtained, directly or indirectly, from the offense charged in this Indictment, and all interest and proceeds traceable thereto, and/or such sum that equals all property derived from or traceable to his violation of Title 18.

B. Electronic Equipment:

Blue Samsung cellular phone

IMEI: 358122562295022 3. On October 30, 2023, Mann pled guilty to the attempt to transfer obscene material to a minor charge and pursuant to a written plea agreement, agreed to forfeiture.

4. Based upon Defendant's conviction, the court has determined that the property described above is subject to forfeiture, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1467 and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c).

5. The court has determined that the government has established the requisite nexus between the said property subject to forfeiture and the offense for which Mann has been convicted; therefore, the United States is entitled to a preliminary order of forfeiture, subject to the provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 853 governing third party rights.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED,

1. The below-described property, and all rights, title, and interest of Defendant, Mark Cyril Mann, in and to such property, is hereby forfeited to the United States of America, for disposition in accordance with law, subject to the rights of third parties in such property under 21 U.S.C. § 853(n):

Electronic Equipment:

Blue Samsung cellular phone IMEI: 358122562295022

2. Upon entry of the criminal judgment, this order becomes final as to Mann, and shall be made a part of his sentence and included in the criminal judgment.

3. The United States shall publish notice of this Order and its intent to dispose of the property in such manner as the Attorney General may direct. The United States may also, to the extent practicable, provide written notice to any person known to have an alleged interest in the said property.

4. Upon entry of this Order, the United States or their designee is authorized to seize the above-described forfeited property as directed by the United States Attorney's Office and to commence proceedings that comply with statutes governing third party rights.

5. Any person, other than the named Defendant, asserting a legal interest in the subject property may, within thirty days of the final publication of notice or receipt of notice, whichever is earlier, petition the court for a hearing without a jury to adjudicate the validity of his alleged interest in the subject property and for an amendment of the order of forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(6) and Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c).

6. Any petition filed by a third party asserting an interest in the abovedescribed property shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the subject property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title or interest in such property, and additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim and the relief sought.

7. After the disposition of any motion filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(c)(1)(A) and before a hearing on the petition, discovery may be conducted in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure upon a showing that such discovery is necessary or desirable to resolve factual issues.

8. The United States shall have clear title to the property following the court's determination of all third party interests, or, if no petitions are filed, following the expiration of the period provided in 21 U.S.C. § 853(n)(2) for the filing of third party petitions.

9. The court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve disputes which may arise and to enforce and amend this Order as necessary, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.2(e).

10. The Clerk, U.S. District Court, shall provide one (1) certified copy of this Order to the United States Attorney's Office.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Mann

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
Apr 30, 2024
CRIMINAL 2:23-cr-00367-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCK CYRIL MANN

Court:United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division

Date published: Apr 30, 2024

Citations

CRIMINAL 2:23-cr-00367-BHH (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2024)