From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Mancusi

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 3, 1966
378 F.2d 368 (2d Cir. 1966)

Opinion

No. MR 714.

November 3, 1966.

Perry Paulding, in pro. per.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. for State of New York, New York City, opposed the motion on behalf of respondent, Vincent Mancusi, Attica, N Y

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and KAUFMAN, Circuit Judges.


Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; certificate of probable cause; assignment of counsel.


We deny the motions and dismiss the petition, without prejudice to petitioner's right to renew his petition in the district court should appropriate proceedings for the relief herein sought be denied in the New York State courts. United States ex rel. Martin v. McMann, 348 F.2d 896 (2 Cir. 1965); United States ex rel. Bagley v. LaVallee, 332 F.2d 890, 892 (2 Cir. 1964). In light of People ex rel. Keitt v. McMann, 18 N.Y.2d 257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653 (1966), the broadened scope of habeas corpus in New York makes it appropriate for the petitioner to seek whatever remedy he may have in such a proceeding in the first instance.


Summaries of

United States v. Mancusi

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 3, 1966
378 F.2d 368 (2d Cir. 1966)
Case details for

United States v. Mancusi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Perry PAULDING, Relator, v. Vincent R…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 3, 1966

Citations

378 F.2d 368 (2d Cir. 1966)

Citing Cases

Reed v. Follette

18 N.Y.2d 257, 273 N.Y.S.2d 897, 220 N.E.2d 653 (1966). See Case v. State of Nebraska, 381 U.S. 336, 85 S.Ct.…

Jones v. Tubman

Id. However, that case does not appear to modify the requirement that exhaustion of state remedies is a…