From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Malik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-CR-426 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:11-CR-426 LKK

05-06-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHIRAZ MALIK, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney RICHARD J. BENDER DANIEL S. McCONKIE Assistant United States Attorneys Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America ALAN R. BAUM Attorney for Shiraz Malik


BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
RICHARD J. BENDER
DANIEL S. McCONKIE
Assistant United States Attorneys
Attorneys for Plaintiff
United States of America

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING

STATUS CONFERENCE

Counsel for both parties hereby agree and request that the status conference presently scheduled for May 7, 2013, be rescheduled to June 11, 2013 at 9:15 a.m. The reason for the request is that the parties are continuing to review the discovery to attempt to resolve a Sentencing Guideline issue that dramatically impacts the application of the Sentencing Guidelines. Once that it done, it is likely that the case will either resolve relatively quickly or a motions and trial schedule will need to be set.

It is also requested that time under the Speedy Trial Act be excluded between and including May7, 2013 to June 11, 2013 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(factually complex case involving international drug trafficking with defendant then located in Pakistan and Poland, 40 count indictment including drug and money laundering charges, large volume of discovery including thousands of emails, recorded phone conversations and recorded undercover meetings in foreign countries).

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

RICHARD J. BENDER

Assistant United States Attorney

________________________

ALAN R. BAUM

Attorney for Shiraz Malik

ORDER

Upon consideration of the above stipulation the status conference in the above captioned case is continued to June 11, 2013 at 9:15 a.m., and that time is excluded pursuant to 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii)(complex case - unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings within the Speedy Trial time limits) between and including May 7, 2013 and June 11, 2013. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial in this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Malik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 2:11-CR-426 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Malik

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SHIRAZ MALIK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:11-CR-426 LKK (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2013)