From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Malek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 14, 2015
CR. 14-40125-01-KES (D.S.D. Sep. 14, 2015)

Opinion

CR. 14-40125-01-KES

09-14-2015

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MALEK SAMUEL MALEK, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Magistrate Judge Veronica Duffy conducted a hearing on defendant's motion to suppress on August 12, 2015. On August 21, 2015, Magistrate Judge Duffy submitted her report and recommendation recommending that the motion to suppress be denied. No objections to such proposed findings and recommendations have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the time for filing objections has passed. The court has considered the case de novo. Therefore, it is

ORDERED that the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Duffy is adopted in full, and defendant's motion to suppress (Docket 47) is denied in its entirety.

Dated September 14, 2015.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen E . Schreier

KAREN E. SCHREIER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Malek

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 14, 2015
CR. 14-40125-01-KES (D.S.D. Sep. 14, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Malek

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MALEK SAMUEL MALEK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 14, 2015

Citations

CR. 14-40125-01-KES (D.S.D. Sep. 14, 2015)

Citing Cases

United States v. Key

While the Eleventh Circuit has not considered precisely how fresh information needs to be in a warrant for a…