United States v. Lopez-Medina

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Lopez-Medina, Defendant.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 7, 2011

Case No.:CR 14-1287 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.:CR 14-1287

10-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Lopez-Medina, Defendant.

ORDER OF DETENTION

[Fed. R. Crim. P. 32.1(a)(6);

18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)]

The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the ____________ for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of his/her [probation] [supervised release] ; and The Court having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a), The Court finds that:

A. (√) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if .released under '18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding.is based on ____________ and/or

B. (√) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by-clear, and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c) . This finding is based on: ____________

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.

________________________

UNITES STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE