From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lopez-Camacho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
Cr.S. 11-0167-GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

Cr.S. 11-0167-GEB

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO, et al., Defendant.

Respectfully submitted, JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW M. SCOBLE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO DINA SANTOS, Attorney for ERNESTO SOTO-GONZALEZ BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DANIEL McCONKIE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Bar# 237432
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER


DATE: April 26, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Garland E. Burrell Jr.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through DANIEL McCONKIE, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant, MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO, by and through his counsel, MATTHEW M. SCOBLE, Assistant Federal Defender, and ERNESTO SOTO-GONZALEZ by and through his counsel, DINA SANTOS, that the status conference set for Friday, March 8, 2013, be continued to Friday, April 26, 2012, at 9:00 a.m..

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, March 7, 2013, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, April 26, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

________________________

MATTHEW M. SCOBLE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO

________________________

DINA SANTOS, Attorney for

ERNESTO SOTO-GONZALEZ

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

DANIEL McCONKIE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is excluded from today's date through and including April 26, 2013, in the interests of justice pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4.

________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Lopez-Camacho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
Cr.S. 11-0167-GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Lopez-Camacho

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. MANUEL LOPEZ-CAMACHO, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

Cr.S. 11-0167-GEB (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)