From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Locust

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2020
No. 20-6483 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2020)

Summary

affirming these Orders

Summary of this case from United States v. Locust

Opinion

No. 20-6483

08-28-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARYL F. LOCUST, a/k/a Derek Locust, a/k/a 8, a/k/a Daryl Frank Locusts, Defendant - Appellant.

Daryl F. Locust, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, Senior District Judge. (4:06-cr-00040-RBS-TEM-1) Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Daryl F. Locust, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Daryl F. Locust appeals the district court's orders denying his motion seeking relief under the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194, and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Locust, No. 4:06-cr-00040-RBS-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 2020; Mar. 13, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Locust

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 28, 2020
No. 20-6483 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2020)

affirming these Orders

Summary of this case from United States v. Locust
Case details for

United States v. Locust

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DARYL F. LOCUST, a/k/a…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 28, 2020

Citations

No. 20-6483 (4th Cir. Aug. 28, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. Locust

The court denied this Motion, ECF No. 86, as well as Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, ECF No. 92,…