Opinion
CRIMINAL NO. 1:17CR32-04
12-04-2018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER LLOYD, Defendant.
( ) ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY IN FELONY CASE (DKT. NO. 1253) , ACCEPTING GUILTY PLEA, AND SCHEDULING SENTENCING HEARING
On November 19, 2018, the defendant, Christopher Lloyd ("Lloyd"), appeared before United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Aloi and moved for permission to enter a plea of GUILTY to Count Fifteen of the Superseding Indictment. After Lloyd stated that he understood that the magistrate judge is not a United States district judge, he consented to tendering his plea before the magistrate judge. Previously, this Court had referred the guilty plea to the magistrate judge for the purposes of administering the allocution pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, making a finding as to whether the plea was knowingly and voluntarily entered, and recommending to this Court whether the plea should be accepted.
Based upon Lloyd's statements during the plea hearing and the government's proffer establishing that an independent factual basis for the plea existed, the magistrate judge found that Lloyd was competent to enter a plea, that the plea was freely and voluntarily given, that he was aware of the nature of the charges against him and the consequences of his plea, and that a factual basis existed for the tendered plea. The magistrate judge entered a Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty in Felony Case ("R&R") (dkt. no. *) finding a factual basis for the plea and recommending that this Court accept Lloyd's plea of guilty to Count Fifteen of the Superseding Indictment.
The magistrate judge also directed the parties to file any written objections to the R&R within fourteen (14) days after service of the R&R. He further advised that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of this Court based on the R&R. The parties did not file any objections to the R&R.
Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the magistrate judge's R&R, ACCEPTS Lloyd's guilty plea, and ADJUGES him GUILTY of the crime charged in Count Fifteen of the SupersedingIndictment.
Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(3) and U.S.S.G. § 6B1.1(c), the Court DEFERS acceptance of the proposed plea agreement until it has received and reviewed the presentence report prepared in this matter.
Pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 6A1 et seq., the Court ORDERS as follows:
1. The Probation Officer shall undertake a presentence investigation of Lloyd, and prepare a presentence report for the Court;
2. The Government and Lloyd shall provide their versions of the offense to the probation officer by December 13, 2018;
3. The presentence report shall be disclosed to Lloyd, defense counsel, and the United States on or before February 13, 2019; however, the Probation Officer shall not disclose any sentencing recommendations made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(3);
4. Counsel may file written objections to the presentence report on or before February 27, 2019;
5. The Office of Probation shall submit the presentence report with addendum to the Court on or before March 11, 2019; and
6. Counsel may file any written sentencing statements and motions for departure from the Sentencing Guidelines, including the factual basis from the statements or motions, on or before March 11, 2019.
The magistrate judge remanded Lloyd to the custody of the United States Marshal Service.
The Court will conduct the sentencing hearing for the defendant on March 26, 2019, at 11:30 A..M. at the Clarksburg, West Virginia point of holding court.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record and all appropriate agencies. DATED: December 4, 2018
/s/ Irene M. Keeley
IRENE M. KEELEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE