From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 10, 2015
2:12-CR-0440 JAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)

Opinion

          GEORGE G. BENETATOS, LAW OFFICE OF GEORGE G. BENETATOS, San Francisco, California, Attorney for DAHOMA LIN.


          ORDER CONTINUING SENTENCING SENTENCING

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding time between April 28, 2015 and July 7, 2015 at 9:15 a.m., so that Counsel for the Defendant and Counsel for the Government may have reasonable additional time necessary to discuss additional plea agreement terms that may affect sentencing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

         IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled to occur on April 28, 2015, is continued to July 7, 2015, at 9:15 a.m. in Courtroom 6, and time is excluded from the Speedy Trial Act during that time period.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following disclosure and reply schedule shall apply, be adhered to by the Probation Officer and all parties unless the schedule is later modified by this Court:


Summaries of

United States v. Lin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Mar 10, 2015
2:12-CR-0440 JAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Lin

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAHOMA LIN aka NINA MONALISA…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2015

Citations

2:12-CR-0440 JAM (E.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2015)