From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lehr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2013
No. CR-S-12-022 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

No. CR-S-12-022 LKK

01-11-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COLLEEN P. LEHR, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar # 87692 Acting Federal Defender MATTHEW C. BOCKMON, Bar # 161566 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant COLLEEN P. LEHR


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar # 87692
Acting Federal Defender
MATTHEW C. BOCKMON, Bar # 161566
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
COLLEEN P. LEHR

ORDER AFTER HEARING


Judge: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

This matter came on for Status Conference on Tuesday, January 8, 2013, in the courtroom of the Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge. Assistant United States Attorney Philip Ferrari appeared on behalf of the United States of America. Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, appeared on behalf of Defendant COLLEEN P. LEHR, who was present out of custody.

A Further Status Conference/Change of Plea hearing date of Tuesday, January 29, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., was set.

Accordingly, the parties stipulated and agreed that the time for trial under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded from January 8, 2013, up to and including January 29, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4, and that the ends of justice to be served in continuing this matter to allow defendant further time to prepare outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants to a speedy trial.

Good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS ORDERED that this matter is continued to Tuesday, January 29, 2013, at 9:15 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)&(B)(iv) and Local Code T4, the period from January 8, 2013, up to and including January 29, 2013, is excluded from the time computations required by the Speedy Trial Act due to ongoing preparation of counsel, and that the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Lehr

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 11, 2013
No. CR-S-12-022 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Lehr

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. COLLEEN P. LEHR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

Citations

No. CR-S-12-022 LKK (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)