Opinion
Criminal No. 19-cr-168-1 (MJD/HB)
10-22-2019
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Roberto Lee (01), Defendant.
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Defendant filed a document entitled "Defendant Lee's Objections to Magistrate Judge's Order and Report and Recommendation," which states that he "objects to Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer's Report and Recommendations and Order Dkt. Nos 184 and 185." [Docket No. 192] However, that document further states: "Specifically, defendant objects as follows:" and proceeds to solely object to the Magistrate Judge's Order [Docket No. 184] with regard to the timing of disclosure of informants. There is no mention of any objection to the Report and Recommendation regarding the motion to suppress evidence. --------
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 185] is ADOPTED; and
2. Defendant Roberto Lee's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. No. 94] is DENIED.Dated: October 22, 2019
s/ Michael J. Davis
MICHAEL J. DAVIS
United States District Judge