From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 31, 2012
No. 3:09-cr-00240-15 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:09-cr-00240-15

07-31-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO LEE


Judge Nixon


ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Antonio Lee's Motion to Allow the Accused Access to IPod ("Motion"). (Doc. No. 733.) The Court has already addressed this matter as to all defendants in a previous Order filed on September 1, 2011. (Doc. No. 608.) That Order provided that "the facilities holding the defendants [in this case] must provide them an opportunity to review the recordings outside the presence of their attorneys," (id. at 2) and recommended that the facilities holding the defendants in this case consider the "Sixth Circuit Budgeting Attorney, Robert J. Ranz['s] . .. [recommendation that] the detained individuals be granted access to iPod nanos or similar personal listening devices to accomplish these goals" (id. at 2-3). The Court thus GRANTS Mr. Lee's Motion pursuant to this previous Order.

It is so ORDERED.

______________________

JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR FUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Lee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Jul 31, 2012
No. 3:09-cr-00240-15 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO LEE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

No. 3:09-cr-00240-15 (M.D. Tenn. Jul. 31, 2012)