From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Layton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 22, 1981
645 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1981)

Opinion

No. 81-1210.

Submitted April 20, 1981.

Decided April 22, 1981.

Frank O., Bell, Asst. Federal Public Defender, San Francisco, Cal., Tony Tamburello, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Robert Dondero, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.


Appellant seeks interlocutory review of the district court's order denying his challenge to venue in that court, 509 F. Supp. 212. The Government, relying on United States v. Martin, 620 F.2d 237, 238-39 (10th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Stipe v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 248, 66 L.Ed.2d 116 (1980), has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The appellant has responded, and he agrees that the order appealed from is not subject to interlocutory review.

We adopt the reasoning of Martin and grant the Government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.


Summaries of

United States v. Layton

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Apr 22, 1981
645 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1981)
Case details for

United States v. Layton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LAURENCE JOHN LAYTON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 22, 1981

Citations

645 F.2d 21 (9th Cir. 1981)