From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Layman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 21, 2005
149 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Norma J. Schrock, Sara Ann Ketchum, DOJ-U.S Department of Justice Tax Division, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Zeke Layman, Chico, CA, for Defendants-Appellants.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California; Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding.

Before REINHARDT, RYMER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Zeke Layman and Darline Koff appeal pro se from the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States, directing foreclosure of liens imposed with respect to unpaid federal income tax liabilities. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Feiler v. United States, 62 F.3d 315, 316 (9th Cir.1995), and we affirm.

The underlying tax assessments were reduced to a judgment in a separate proceeding, which Layman and Koff do not contest. The district court properly rejected Layman and Koff's contention that under the pertinent statute of limitations, the United States was precluded from foreclosing on the liens. Once an assessment has been reduced to a judgment, the tax liability cannot become unenforceable by reason of time. See United States v. Overman, 424 F.2d 1142, 1147 (9th Cir.1970).

The district court also properly rejected Layman and Koff's contention that her 2004 bankruptcy discharge prevented further efforts to collect the assessments which were first made in 1989. A tax lien attaching a debtor's property or property rights that predates the petition for bankruptcy remains attached after termination of bankruptcy proceedings. See Johnson

Page 677.

v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 84, 111 S.Ct. 2150, 115 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991).

Layman and Koff's remaining contentions lack merit.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Layman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 21, 2005
149 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

United States v. Layman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Zeke LAYMAN; et al.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 21, 2005

Citations

149 F. App'x 675 (9th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wardle

” United States v. Layman, 149 Fed.Appx. 675, 676 (9th Cir. 2005). Wardle's tax liability previously…

United States v. Sprenger

If the tax liens are reduced to judgment in an action commenced within this time period, however, the liens…