From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Laurean-Lozoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 13, 2018
No. CR-18-00700-001-TUC-RM (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 13, 2018)

Summary

finding that since defendant had been removed from the United States while a criminal action was pending, dismissal was necessary under the court's supervisory powers

Summary of this case from United States v. Covarrubias

Opinion

No. CR-18-00700-001-TUC-RM (BGM)

11-13-2018

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Juan Carlos Laurean-Lozoya, Defendant.


ORDER

On October 23, 2018, Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) recommending that this Court grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Indictment with Prejudice (Doc. 25). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed.

A district judge must "make a de novo determination of those portions" of a magistrate judge's "report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee's notes to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, "[w]hen no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation" of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee's note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) ("If no objection or only partial objection is made, the district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error."); Prior v. Ryan, CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation).

The Court has reviewed Judge Bruce G. Macdonald's Report and Recommendation, the parties' briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Bruce G. Macdonald's Report and Recommendation. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 43) is accepted and adopted in full.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Juan Carlos Laurean-Lozoya's Motion to Dismiss Indictment with Prejudice (Doc. 25) is granted. The indictment in the above-captioned matter against Defendant Juan Carlos Laurean-Lozoya is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated this 13th day of November, 2018.

/s/_________

Honorable Rosemary Márquez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Laurean-Lozoya

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nov 13, 2018
No. CR-18-00700-001-TUC-RM (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 13, 2018)

finding that since defendant had been removed from the United States while a criminal action was pending, dismissal was necessary under the court's supervisory powers

Summary of this case from United States v. Covarrubias
Case details for

United States v. Laurean-Lozoya

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Juan Carlos Laurean-Lozoya…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Nov 13, 2018

Citations

No. CR-18-00700-001-TUC-RM (BGM) (D. Ariz. Nov. 13, 2018)

Citing Cases

United States v. Covarrubias

So here, unlike in the cases cited by Covarrubias, ICE clearly surrendered pursuing deportation, and passed…