From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lauderdale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 14, 2013
Case No. 3:09-cr-121 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cr-121

08-14-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. SHAWN LAUDERDALE, Defendant.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #72), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. #66) be GRANTED. The Court will set this case for re-sentencing under the Fair Sentencing Act.

___________

Thomas M. Rose

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Lauderdale

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Aug 14, 2013
Case No. 3:09-cr-121 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Lauderdale

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. SHAWN LAUDERDALE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Aug 14, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cr-121 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 14, 2013)